Is AI rendering worth it for a small practice?

It depends on how many images you currently skip. If you outsource a few renders a year the saving is modest; if you regularly go without images because they are too slow or expensive, that is where it pays.

The wrong way to judge this is against your outsourcing bill, because most small practices do not outsource much. The right way is to count the images you never made. The option you did not show the client. The material study you described in words. The competition board that went out with a diagram where a render should have been. Those are the ones this changes.

The arithmetic is worth doing with your own numbers rather than ours. A studio still image commonly runs from a few hundred to a couple of thousand US dollars, with revisions charged separately, and in-house production costs whatever your time is worth multiplied by the setup hours. Against $29 or $49 a month, the crossover point arrives quickly — usually at the second or third image.

The honest caveat is the same one that appears throughout these answers. This does not produce the final, physically accurate hero image on a project where the image is the deliverable. It produces the twenty images around it, quickly, at a quality that holds up in front of a client at concept and option stages.

The free tier exists so you can answer this on your own project rather than on our claims. Five renders a month, no card, and a rendering cost calculator that does not ask for your email.

Try it on your own project

100 free credits to start, no credit card. You will need an image to start from — a plan, sketch, photo or viewport capture.

Related

Other questions

All questions