What if the result comes back wrong?

Retries are part of the workflow rather than an exception to it. A result can miss because the style direction was vague, because the room is unusually shaped, or because the photo itself is dark or heavily occluded. Changing the style and running again usually resolves it, and the second attempt takes another thirty seconds rather than another day.

Two things make retries land: name the materials rather than asking for quality in the abstract, and change one thing at a time. "Warm oak flooring, cream walls, mid-century furniture" produces a different result reliably; "make it nicer" mostly produces the same image again.

The cost of a retry is the credits, which is the honest trade against a human editing service where a revision means another email and another turnaround. If an output shows something structurally wrong — a moved window, an invented fixture — that is a defect rather than a prompt problem and it is worth reporting.